Author |
Message |
The Borg_TSGK
TSGK Member

Joined: 13 Mar 2007 Posts: 2756 Location: Suffolk, England Country:  Age: 53
|
Posted: Sun Dec 13, 2009 11:40 Post subject:
Graphics card |
|
At the moment i have a internal motherboard/graphics card which uses my 3gb memory.
I'm thinking of replacing this with either
Nvidia 9500GT for £44
or
Geforce GT220 for £59
Both have 1gb of internal memory
£60 is max want i want to spend unless you guys can tell me of something better and then i could go a few quid more.
Please put your thinking caps on and make any suggestions. Also a link if you find one for a good price
TIA
Current internal graphics card is a radeon hd2400
_________________

|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Zog Ecosse

Joined: 17 Apr 2007 Posts: 788 Location: Lerwick Shetland Country:  Browser:  Age: 73
|
Posted: Sun Dec 13, 2009 12:39 Post subject:
|
|
This is the best 220 I can find and is near as damn it £60.
It will use all the memory up to the 4Gb limit if you are using a 32 bit
operating system given you have 3Gb installed.
http://www.aria.co.uk/Products/Components/Graphics+Cards/PCI-E/nVIDIA+GeForce+GT220/GAINWARD+GeForce%C2%AE+GT220+1024MB+?productId=38330
or for £6 more you can get the faster 240GT
http://www.aria.co.uk/Products/Components/Graphics+Cards/PCI-E/nVIDIA+GT+240+Series/PALIT+NVIDIA+GEFORCE+GT+240+1GB+%2Fw+HDMI+?productId=38705
or this one which is under budget and factory overclocked
http://www.scan.co.uk/Products/1GB-Gigabyte-GT-220-OC-1600MHz-GDDR3-GPU-720MHz-Shader-1566MHz-48-Cores-D-Sub-DL-DVI-I-HDMI
ps remember the VAT goes up 2.5% on the first of January
_________________
"You don't have to be mad to live on the planet Zog but it definitely helps"
Tharg of Zog
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
StonedCabbage
TSGK Member

Joined: 18 Jun 2006 Posts: 2273 Location: Birmingham, United Kingdom Country:  Browser:  Age: 38
|
Posted: Sun Dec 13, 2009 13:51 Post subject:
|
|
Zog Ecosse wrote: |
ps remember the VAT goes up 2.5% on the first of January |
the greedy b**tards were trying to peddle the idea of 18.5% or even 20%, all a con
_________________
I hope that packet gets lost forever in network oblivion
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Growling_Mad_Scientist
TSGK Member

Joined: 17 Apr 2007 Posts: 321 Country:  Browser:  Age: 43
|
Posted: Sun Dec 13, 2009 17:02 Post subject:
|
|
Borg, if u want a cheap videocard right now, any of those are bad choice, considering their price and performance.
Ati HD4670 has better performance, and is cheaper.
U might want consider the GT240 that Zog mentioned if u think the extra money is worth the the few fps more.
GT240 review:
http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/Axle/GeForce_GT_240/7.html
HD4670 Review:
http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/Powercolor/HD_4670/6.html
http://www.aria.co.uk/Products/Components/Graphics+Cards/PCI-E/ATI+Radeon+4000+Series/Gigabyte+ATI+Radeon+HD+4670+1024MB+GDDR3+PCI-Express+Graphics+Card+?productId=39039
http://www.aria.co.uk/Products/Components/Graphics+Cards/PCI-E/ATI+Radeon+4000+Series/Asus+ATI+Radeon+HD+4670+512MB+GDDR3+PCI-Express+Graphics+Card+?productId=37473
I tested one those Gigabyte, from a friend of mine, and it was the 512mb.
Runed hl2dm and CSS all maxed up, with 4xAA, 16xAF at 1920x1200.
Even Race Driver Grid, the card managed to run it smooth at same res, with some lowered settings.
Nvidia cards in the lower end, are kinda of a shame, they dont have the performance for the money they ask for.
But u can find some 9600GT at good price, if u do so, i would recomend the 9600GT and nothing else.
http://www.aria.co.uk/Products/Components/Graphics+Cards/PCI-E/nVIDIA+GeForce+9+Series/GAINWARD+9600GT+512MB+?productId=38165
_________________

|
Back to top
|
|
 |
The Borg_TSGK
TSGK Member

Joined: 13 Mar 2007 Posts: 2756 Location: Suffolk, England Country:  Age: 53
|
Posted: Sun Dec 13, 2009 18:24 Post subject:
|
|
I can never get my head around all these figures
Why would a card with 512mb be better than a card with 1gb?
_________________

|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Zog Ecosse

Joined: 17 Apr 2007 Posts: 788 Location: Lerwick Shetland Country:  Browser:  Age: 73
|
Posted: Sun Dec 13, 2009 19:59 Post subject:
|
|
Like myself, do you watch the pennies?
I know you ran a 7600 for a while (as did I) and I upgraded to a BFG 9800 factory overclocked. I also have a i7 running a 3.3ghz. which is cost me £500 less than the extreem vesion of than the chip. (ty Dav)
I am not going to upgrade my gfx card until DX 11 comes out.
At the end of the day there is one card there tharts got a 5 year warranty.
My bfg has a lifetime warranty. Next month it will be yesterdays tecnology but a least if it goes tits up, you got comeback.
£60 is a good interim budget to get you up and running in the short term.
Look at the spec of the games you want to play and look at the spec DM2 runs on and then make your choice.
_________________
"You don't have to be mad to live on the planet Zog but it definitely helps"
Tharg of Zog
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Growling_Mad_Scientist
TSGK Member

Joined: 17 Apr 2007 Posts: 321 Country:  Browser:  Age: 43
|
Posted: Sun Dec 13, 2009 20:33 Post subject:
|
|
The Borg_TSGK wrote: |
I can never get my head around all these figures
Why would a card with 512mb be better than a card with 1gb? |
Ok, so, 1st thing, never choose a videocard just because the amount of memory it got.
An example, grab a 9500GT with 1GB mem, or even 2GB, ive seen some crazy memory configurations in some lower end cards.
Then, put that 9500GT 1GB/2GB to the test, against, lets say, a 9800GT/GTX like Zog have with only 512mb.
The 9800 will still kick 9500GT ass, badly....
The chip/core of the videocard makes all the diference first, and always.
So, when does the amount of memory makes diference??
first, depends on what resolution you play, lower res, u dont need much, reach 1920x1200 and memory limitation kicks in.
second, will depend on the game itself, nowadays, new games, more and more, use more memory, higher quality textures, and so on....
But, even in a game that needs that much of memory, a 9500GT with 2GB memory, wont do nothing.....
so, u need to balance, chip performance, and memory.
An example, that hapened with me, lets say a game like css, or hl2, a simple 7900GT with 256mb is enough to run them all maxed out, even with AA enabled at 1280x1024.
Now, run it in 1920x1200, with same settings, and i get 10.52fps in hl2 lost coast test, i take off AA, and i got 74fps..... whats the problem?? not enough memory.
Another example, i runned 8800GT 512mb in SLI, 1920x1200, in Crysis, all settings on high, i got 37fps average, with AA off. i turn on 4xAA, and i have 7fps average.....
So, you have to consider, at what resolution u going to play. if u still at something below then 1680x1050, 512mb card, is pretty enough. even in most recent games. if u up to 1920x1200 and more, then go with something with more memory.
Anyway, if u go with something with more memory, u will be more future proof, but, if its a lower end card, u will still be stucked...
resolution u play/games u will play/money u want to spend, then make your choice.
PS- Just buy a HD5970 2GB and dont worry anymore!
_________________

|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Zog Ecosse

Joined: 17 Apr 2007 Posts: 788 Location: Lerwick Shetland Country:  Browser:  Age: 73
|
Posted: Sun Dec 13, 2009 22:00 Post subject:
|
|
Ha we cross sticks agian
No, its not a bog standard 9800, its factory oc 1Gb.
It maxes out at 300 fps and rarely drops below 250 on a decent server unless its full and I have a severe ping penalty.
In addition to this you have to look a the motherbaord and what the pcie slot can do.
You have also missed the point - the budget. Also, under no circumstances, do you want to use system memory.
I cheapest 512k 9800 I could find was £75 otherwise I would have recomended it.. That should say a lot about the card and what the 2xx series is, where it owes its (clone) pedigre too.
_________________
"You don't have to be mad to live on the planet Zog but it definitely helps"
Tharg of Zog
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
The Borg_TSGK
TSGK Member

Joined: 13 Mar 2007 Posts: 2756 Location: Suffolk, England Country:  Age: 53
|
Posted: Sun Dec 13, 2009 22:10 Post subject:
|
|
I looked at the 9600gt but it says its needs a pci express 2.0 slot
the m/b i have is a
ConRoe1333-D667 R3.0
I i believe this is only a pci express 1.0 slot so i assume this card would be no good for me??????????????
The HD4670 is also pci express 2
Can you check my m/b specs and recommend what would be best (hopefully and confused)
_________________

|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Growling_Mad_Scientist
TSGK Member

Joined: 17 Apr 2007 Posts: 321 Country:  Browser:  Age: 43
|
Posted: Sun Dec 13, 2009 22:56 Post subject:
|
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PCI_Express
"PCIe 2.0 motherboard slots are backward compatible with PCIe v1.x. PCIe 2.0 cards have good backward compatibility,
new PCIe 2.0 graphics cards are compatible with PCIe 1.1 motherboards, meaning that they will run on them using the available bandwidth of PCI Express 1.1.
Overall, graphic cards or motherboards designed for v 2.0 will be able to work with the other being v 1.1 or v 1.0."
You shouldnt have problems puting a 9600GT or HD4670 in that motherboard.
_________________

|
Back to top
|
|
 |
The Borg_TSGK
TSGK Member

Joined: 13 Mar 2007 Posts: 2756 Location: Suffolk, England Country:  Age: 53
|
Posted: Mon Dec 14, 2009 10:14 Post subject:
|
|
Thanks for all your help
Have a 9600GT 512mb on its way though nearly got the 1mb untill my wallet kicked me
_________________

|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Shimmy_TSGK
TSGK Member

Joined: 25 May 2006 Posts: 2444 Location: Dubai, 2 clicks away from Burj Khalifa Country:  Browser:  Age: 42
|
Posted: Mon Dec 14, 2009 11:25 Post subject:
|
|
The Borg_TSGK wrote: |
Thanks for all your help
Have a 9600GT 512mb on its way though nearly got the 1mb untill my wallet kicked me  |
tis a good card,me laptop has it, runs just everything fine,desktop version is much faster so you will be pleased
_________________
Illyria says: I am not going to explain why?you are too stupid to get it.

|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Lawitz
TSGK Member

Joined: 19 Aug 2006 Posts: 2337 Country:  Browser:  Age: 36
|
Posted: Mon Dec 14, 2009 15:25 Post subject:
|
|
when would you recommend me to get a new system?
right now I have:
intel 6400 (could be overclocked to 3ghz, never got round to do it (never overclocked before))
8800gts 640mb (still runs everything, not highest but ok)
2gb ram (sometimes I hit more than 2gb usage, with windows 7 I´d need 4 at least)
the only game I´m looking forward to right now would be bioshock 2, not sure what else there will be that I´d play. judging by that it would be sometime next year to buy a new system. I´d like to buy when some new ground breaking stuff comes out like a new gpu or cpu line. when would that be?
_________________

|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Zog Ecosse

Joined: 17 Apr 2007 Posts: 788 Location: Lerwick Shetland Country:  Browser:  Age: 73
|
Posted: Mon Dec 14, 2009 16:07 Post subject:
|
|
I have just upgrade from the 6400 to an i7 920. I built a rig arround the 6400 about three years ago and now it is getting a bit long in the tooth.
There were several reasons for the upgrade~
The mobo was strangling my 9800 gfx card.
It basically could not run L4d2 any sense online.
VAT is increasing by 2.5% on the 1st. January.
In some of the new games, this processor is about the minimum spec to run them.
I am moving onto W7 shortly and want to take advantage of the 64 bit version of the OS and the increased ram capability.
There was the cheaper option of the i7 8xx series using dual channel ddr2. But I was looking to build something that was a bit future proof.
Thanks to Lord Davros and better heatsink it now runs stable at 3.3Ghz.
This is 100Mhz faster than the extreem i7 9xx processor costing £500 more.
For me it was correct time to move on without feeling I had to justfy the £450 price tag.
Like yourself, I am looking forward to Bioshock 2 and do not want it to be
a big dissapointment because of midiocre kit. Your gfx card supports DX10 and I would hang fire on replacing that until we hear about DX11.
_________________
"You don't have to be mad to live on the planet Zog but it definitely helps"
Tharg of Zog
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Xmeagol
Incontinent beast

Joined: 26 Oct 2006 Posts: 3612 Location: Oh my god look behind you it's an evil combine advisor with a raging erection oh my god. Country:  Browser:  Age: 703
|
Posted: Mon Dec 14, 2009 22:19 Post subject:
|
|
I run a HD4850 on a P45 motherboard (PCIe 1.1)
With a god damned OEM PSU
Hell yeah.
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Wonderbanana

Joined: 01 Jan 2007 Posts: 404 Location: Hertfordshire Country:  Browser:  Age: 49
|
Posted: Wed Dec 16, 2009 12:35 Post subject:
|
|
Xmeagol wrote: |
I run a HD4850 on a P45 motherboard (PCIe 1.1)
With a god damned OEM PSU
Hell yeah.  |
I blew up an Antec PSU not long back due to changing my GFX card
_________________

|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Lawitz
TSGK Member

Joined: 19 Aug 2006 Posts: 2337 Country:  Browser:  Age: 36
|
Posted: Wed Dec 16, 2009 15:50 Post subject:
|
|
its not recommended to toy around with psus and getting them to run at the limit or use cheap brands. once it goes bang it could also take with it your hardware. I had one psu that died kind of badly (sparks, a big BANG! sound and the safety fuse went out which left the house in the dark) and I´m thankful it wasn´t some cheap psu as there the risk is higher that it will kill your system as well.
_________________

|
Back to top
|
|
 |
|